Ex parte GUBERNICK - Page 5




          Appeal No. 98-1047                                                          
          Application 08/612,814                                                      


               According to the examiner, it would have been obvious to               
          one of ordinary skill in the art to "construct the ball-like                
          deformable grip taught by Scatterday with indicia printed on                
          the exterior surface as taught by Thomas as an alternate                    
          medium in which to have calendar indicia disposed and a means               
          of providing expandable or stretchable indicia" (answer, page               
          4).  To support this conclusion, the examiner takes official                
          notice that it is old and well known in the art to place                    
          indicia on the exterior                                                     




          surface of an elastic balloon or ball and that the indicia                  
          will deform or stretch as the underlying surface deforms and                
          stretches (see pages 4 through 6 in the answer).                            
               We agree with the appellant, however, that Scatterday,                 
          Thomas and the prior art knowledge officially noticed by the                
          examiner would not have suggested the deformable calendar                   
          recited in independent claims 1 and 8.                                      
               As indicated above, Scatterday's deformable, ball-like                 
          grip does not include any indicia, much less the tabular                    
          register of calendar indicia required by claims 1 and 8.  The               
                                         -5-                                          





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007