THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered
today (1) was not written for publication in a law
journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 23
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
Ex parte RAYMOND E.HOYT, III, JERRY L. HAUCK and TOM ARTUNIAN
Appeal No. 98-1239
Application No. 08/742,3721
ON BRIEF
Before McCANDLISH, Senior Administrative Patent Judge,
MEISTER and FRANKFORT, Administrative Patent Judges.
MEISTER, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
Raymond E. Hoyt, III, Jerry L. Hauck and Tom Artunian
(the
1Application for patent filed November 1, 1996. According
to appellants, this application is a continuation of
Application 08/693,568 filed August 7, 1996, now abandoned;
which is a continuation of Application 08/321,516 filed
October 12, 1994, now abandoned.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007