THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was
not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding
precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 14
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte JOSEPH J. ESTWANIK
____________
Appeal No. 98-1242
Application No. 08/498,8841
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before ABRAMS, FRANKFORT, and PATE, Administrative Patent
Judges.
ABRAMS, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal from the decision of the examiner
finally rejecting claims 1-15, which constitute all of the
1Application for patent filed July 6, 1995. According to
appellant, this application is a continuation of Application
No. 29/023,620 filed May 27, 1994, now U.S. Design Patent No.
D367,731 issued March 5, 1996.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007