THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper No. 21 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ____________ Ex parte BERNARD KRAEUTLER ____________ Appeal No. 98-1243 Application No. 08/679,9391 ____________ ON BRIEF ____________ Before COHEN, MEISTER and ABRAMS, Administrative Patent Judges. ABRAMS, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL 1Application for patent filed July 15, 1996. According to appellant, this application is a continuation of Application No. 08/440,452 filed May 12, 1995, now abandoned; which is a continuation of Application No. 08/130,192 filed October 2, 1993, now U.S. Patent No. 5,477,902 issued December 26, 1995.Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007