THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written
for publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 24
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte STEPHEN M. GRUSSMARK
____________
Appeal No. 98-1252
Application No. 08/642,1841
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before MEISTER, ABRAMS and STAAB, Administrative Patent Judges.
MEISTER, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
Stephen M. Grussmark (the appellant) appeals from the
final rejection of claims 1, 2, 12, 15-17 and 22-24. Claims 6-
1Application for patent filed May 6, 1996. According to
appellant, this application is a continuation of Application
No. 08/430,391 filed April 28, 1995, now abandoned; which is a
continuation-in-part of Application No. 08/194,406 filed
February 10, 1994, now abandoned.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007