Appeal No. 98-1252 Page 17 Application No. 08/642,184 The rejection of claim 15 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 based on the combined teachings of Paulson and Grussmark is affirmed. The rejection of claim 16 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 based on the combined teachings of Paulson in view of Grussmark and White is reversed. The rejection of claim 24 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over Miles in view of Grussmark is affirmed. No time period for taking any subsequent action in connection with this appeal may be extended under 37 CFR § 1.136(a). AFFIRMED-IN-PART JAMES M. MEISTER ) Administrative Patent Judge ) ) ) ) ) BOARD OF PATENT NEAL E. ABRAMS ) APPEALS Administrative Patent Judge ) AND ) INTERFERENCES ) ) ) LAWRENCE J. STAAB )Page: Previous 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007