THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for publication in a law
journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 26
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_____________
Ex parte MICHAEL R. CORRUNKER,
DRAGAN BOGOVICAN,
LAVERNE R. NEWMAN,
PAVEL BUCU and
PAUL R. CHANDLER
_____________
Appeal No. 98-12611
Application No. 08/435,869
______________
ON BRIEF
_______________
Before McCANDLISH, Senior Administrative Patent Judge, ABRAMS and NASE,
Administrative Patent Judges
ABRAMS, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal from the decision of the examiner finally rejecting claims 17-27. At that point,
Application for patent filed May 4, 1995. According to appellants, this application is a1
continuation-in-part of Application No. 08/390,034, filed February 17, 1995, now abandoned.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007