THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was
not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding
precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 19
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte THOMAS E. HALL, JOHN J. McDONALD and KEVIN RUPLEY
____________
Appeal No. 98-1264
Application No. 08/489,2721
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before CALVERT, ABRAMS, and STAAB, Administrative Patent
Judges.
ABRAMS, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal from the decision of the examiner
finally rejecting claims 1-8, 11-15 and 17-20, which constitute
all of the claims remaining of record in the application.
However, the examiner has since indicated that claim 4 contains
1Application for patent filed June 9, 1995.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007