Ex parte VANGOMPEL et al. - Page 11




          Appeal No. 98-1314                                                          
          Application No. 08/421,640                                                  


          Krushnel and Rossini and (b) based on the combined teachings                
          of Flug and Rossini.                                                        
               In summary:                                                            
               The rejections under 35 U.S.C. § 103 of (a) claims 1, 2,               
          4, 6-9, 11-15, 17-22, 25-35, 37 and 38 based on the combined                
          teachings of Krushnel and Rossini and (b) claims 1, 2, 4, 6-                
          15, 17-22, 25-35, 37 and 38 based on the combined teachings of              
          Flug and Rossini are both affirmed.                                         
               The rejections under 35 U.S.C. § 103 of claims 36 and 39-              
          41 (a) based on the combined teachings of Krushnel and Rossini              
          and (b) based on the combined teachings of Flug and Rossini                 
          are both reversed.                                                          
               No time period for taking any subsequent action in                     
          connection with this appeal may be extended under 37 CFR                    
          § 1.136(a).                                                                 




                                  AFFIRMED-IN-PART                                    






                                          11                                          





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007