Appeal No. 98-1316 Application No. 08/420,896 Here, the appellants have incorporated Fig. 1A of Jacobsen into their drawings as Figure 2 and state on pages 4 and 5 of the specification that: Figure 2 sets forth a figure from U.S. Patent No. 5,141,493 [i.e., Jacobsen]. Figure 2 illustrates the three loop system of the '493 patent wherein dialysate is reciprocated into and out of the patient using a reversible pump (first loop) into a second loop. In the second loop, the dialysate passes through a dialyzer being regenerated by non-sterile dialysate flowing in the third loop. The difference between the '493 system and the earlier systems is that both regeneration and reciprocation are continuous. All of the above investigators have reported increased small molecule clearance and high ultrafiltration with either a continuous flow or reciprocating type systems. Naturally, an advantage of this type is desirable. However, these prior systems are quite complex in their operation, set- up, and control. More specifically, Jacobsen discloses a primary circuit 4 which includes a constant speed pump 16, bubble trap 20, dialyzer 24, restriction 36 and three-liter bag 48 (that allows the user to maintain some of the dialysate fluid flowing in the primary circuit 4; see column 5, lines 9-12). The dialysate fluid is alternately pumped by pump 72 from the circuit 4 into the patient and then back from the patient into circuit 4 where the dialysate fluid (which includes 5Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007