THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written
for publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 26
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte DEAN L. SICKING and BRIAN G. PFEIFER
____________
Appeal No. 98-1461
Application No. 08/335,1531
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before MEISTER, ABRAMS, and NASE, Administrative Patent Judges.
NASE, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final
rejection of claims 17, 19 through 22, 25 and 27. Claims 1 2
through 5, 18, 23, 24 and 26 have been allowed. Claims 6
1Application for patent filed November 7, 1994.
2Claim 22 was amended subsequent to the final rejection.
The examiner has withdrawn the 35 U.S.C. § 112, second
paragraph, rejection of claim 22.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007