Appeal No. 98-1499 Application No. 08/392,493 paragraph (i) of independent claims 1, 36, 42 and 46, and in independent claim 47) is based on a misconception concerning the nature of the heating and cooling fluid subchannel sets in the face of each heat exchange plate, and that such error has led to an inappropriate rejection of claims 1, 27, 36, 42, 44, 46 and 47 under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) based on Takeshita, we will not sustain this rejection. Each of the claims on appeal define a heat exchanger which includes a heat exchange plate or a plurality of heat exchange plates, wherein each of the plates has a front facial surface and (A) a first heating fluid facial subchannel set comprising at least one heating fluid facial subchannel and (B) a first cooling fluid facial subchannel set comprising at least one cooling fluid facial subchannel, with the first heating fluid facial subchannel set and the first cooling fluid facial subchannel set being mutually aligned in a first heat exchange relationship on the common facial surface. The claims on appeal further set forth with regard to one embodiment covered thereby (e.g., (i) of claims 1, 36, 42 and 46) that said first heating fluid facial subchannel set and 7Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007