THIS OPINION WAS NOT W RITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was
not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding
precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 15
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte DOMINIC J. PILEGGI
____________
Appeal No. 98-1528
Application No. 08/374,0391
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before MEISTER, ABRAMS, and FRANKFORT, Administrative Patent
Judges.
ABRAMS, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal from the decision of the examiner
finally rejecting claims 1-6, 9-12 and 22-26, which constitute
all of the claims remaining of record in the application.
The appellant's invention is directed to a method of
providing acknowledgment from a recipient of an occupant’s
1Application for patent filed January 18, 1995.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007