Appeal No. 1998-1610 Application No. 08/551,319 to said bottom" in Figure 16A. We do not agree. Spann describes the embodiment shown in Figure 16A as having voids that extend entirely through the pad. However, as shown in Figure 16A, the voids or apertures 43 extend only in the areas between the promontorys. Thus, the voids in Figure 16A do not have sides that extend from the tops of the promontorys (which form the top of the pad) to the bottom of the pad as required by claim 1. Figure 16A also fails to show that the voids are substantially planar and four-sided and that each side is perpendicular to the top and bottom of the pad. As to argument (2), the examiner has acknowledged (answer, sentence bridging pages 3 and 4) that Spann fails to expressly disclose passageway sides formed from a foam material having low compressibility whereby the sides retain their shape throughout under the compressive weight of an infant. However, the examiner contends that "Spann appears to 9Page: Previous 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007