Appeal No. 1998-1650 Page 12
Application No. 08/715,749
We have also reviewed the Naganawa, Kanamaru and Sato
references additionally applied in the rejection of claims 8,
9 and 26 but find nothing therein which makes up for the
deficiencies of Wendel and Murray discussed above.
For the reasons stated above, the decision of the
examiner to reject claims 2, 4 to 9, 19 to 22 and 24 to 26
under 35 U.S.C. § 103 is reversed.
CONCLUSION
To summarize, the decision of the examiner to reject
claims 2, 4 to 9, 19 to 22 and 24 to 26 under 35 U.S.C. § 103
is reversed.
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007