Appeal No. 1998-1775 Application 08/249,611 We turn first to the examiner’s rejection of claims 1, 3 and 5 through 8 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over Nash in view of Martin. Nash discloses a forearm support to reduce fatigue during the extended manipulation of a computer mouse. The forearm support has a forward portion 12 which is supported at a declination to a rearward portion 14. Nash also discloses that: It is intended that a forearm can be positioned lengthwise along the support 10 with the forward portion of the forearm of the user position[ed] at the forward portion 12 with the wrist of the user extending forwardly from the forward portion 12 of the support 10. [Col. 2, lines 4 to 9]. Martin discloses a support block for supporting the hand and wrist of a computer user and a retainer for retaining a computer mouse in fixed relation to the support block. The examiner states: It would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art at the time of the invention was made to modify Nash ‘835 to include a computer mouse 4Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007