THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written
for publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 15
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte GEORGE E. KOCHANOWSKI
____________
Appeal No. 1998-1782
Application No. 08/472,3321
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before STAAB, NASE, and CRAWFORD, Administrative Patent Judges.
NASE, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final
rejection of claims 1 through 14 and 19 through 21. Claims 15
and 16 have been allowed. Claims 17 and 18 have been
1Application for patent filed June 7, 1995. According to
the appellant, the application is a continuation-in-part of
Application No. 08/119,291, filed September 8, 1993, now U.S.
Patent No. 5,442,870, issued August 22, 1995.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007