Ex parte WARNER et al. - Page 2




          Appeal No. 1998-1807                                                        
          Application No. 08/090,770                                                  


          stand withdrawn from consideration under 37 CFR § 1.142(b) as               
          being directed to a nonelected invention.                                   
               We REVERSE.                                                            
               The invention relates to a method of making a low cost                 
          disposable plateau honing tool having an elongated mounting                 
          base and an elongated projecting section which terminates in                
          an elongated working face which includes the steps of forming               
          a mixture of a plastic melt and an abrasive material and                    
          injecting the mixture at high pressure into a mold to form the              
          tool (specification, page 2).  Claim 1 is illustrative of the               
          subject matter on appeal and is reproduced below:                           
               1. A method of making a plateau honing tool having                     
               an elongated mounting base, and a somewhat smaller                     
               elongated projecting section which terminates in an                    
               elongated working face of the tool comprising the                      
               steps of mixing a plastic melt and abrasive into a                     
               homogenous mixture, injecting such mixture into a                      
               mold at high pressure to form said honing tool,                        
               cooling the mixture, and removing the tool from the                    
               mold.                                                                  
               The prior art references of record relied upon by the                  
          examiner in rejecting the appealed claims are:                              
          Pieper et al.            5,152,917                     Oct.                 
          06, 1992                                                                    
          (Pieper)                                                                    
          Wiand                    5,209,760                     May  11,             
          1993                                                                        
                                          2                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007