THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written
for publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 12
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte DONALD J. EDWARDS and DONALD V. EDWARDS
____________
Appeal No. 98-1922
Application No. 08/253,7211
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before MEISTER, NASE, and GONZALES, Administrative Patent
Judges.
NASE, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final
rejection of claims 2 through 13 and 16. Claims 15 and 17
have been allowed. Claims 1 and 14 have been canceled. On
page 2 of the substitute brief (Paper No. 8, filed August 19,
1997), the appellants canceled claim 13. Accordingly, this
Application for patent filed June 3, 1994.1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007