Appeal No. 1998-1930 Page 6 Application No. 08/517,183 in the factual basis for the rejection. See In re Warner, 379 F.2d 1011, 1017, 154 USPQ 173, 177 (CCPA 1967), cert. denied, 389 U.S. 1057 (1968). With this as background, we analyze the prior art applied by the examiner in the rejection of the claims on appeal. Muk Kim discloses a pipe for a fishing rod. As shown in Figure 1, the pipe includes a cylinder 1 having an outer surface, and a flexible rectangular wrapper 9 positioned about the outer surface. The wrapper has a predetermined design thereon and is covered with a transparent preservative coating. Muk Kim teaches (column 2, lines 45--48) that in the preferred embodiment the wrapper 9 carries a predetermined design 3 which displays pictures of fish which are dyed on the wrapper.Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007