THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered
today (1) was not written for publication in a law
journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 36
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
________________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
________________
Ex parte AUGUST LIEPOLD, BERND SCHOLTYSIK,
HARTMUT THIELE and JOSE TORAL
________________
Appeal No. 98-1938
Application 08/570,1961
________________
ON BRIEF
________________
Before FRANKFORT, McQUADE and CRAWFORD, Administrative Patent
Judges.
FRANKFORT, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
1Application for patent filed December 11, 1995.
According to appellants, the application is a continuation of
Application 08/121,433, filed September 16, 1993, now
abandoned, which is a division of Application 07/835,833,
filed February 18, 1992, now U. S. Patent No. 5,257,749,
issued November 2, 1993.
-1-
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007