THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper No. 21 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE __________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES __________ Ex parte WEN F. YU and EUGENE E. RHODES __________ Appeal No. 98-1947 Application 08/431,7021 ___________ ON BRIEF ___________ Before COHEN, FRANKFORT, and GONZALES, Administrative Patent Judges. FRANKFORT, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final rejection of claims 1 through 4 and 6. Claim 5, the only other claim remaining in the application, has been withdrawn from further consideration under 37 CFR § 1.142(b) as being directed to a non-elected invention. 1 Application for patent filed April 28, 1995. 1Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007