THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written
for publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 10
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte GREGORY M. SERDUKE
____________
Appeal No. 1998-1969
Application No. 08/535,7081
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before McCANDLISH, Senior Administrative Patent Judge,
FRANKFORT and NASE, Administrative Patent Judges.
NASE, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final
rejection of claims 13 through 17. Claims 1, 3 through 7 and
10 through 12 have been allowed. Claims 2, 8 and 9 have been
canceled. Subsequent to the appeal, claim 17 has been
1Application for patent filed September 28, 1995.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007