THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for publication in a law
journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 30
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_____________
Ex parte ALAN N. SCHWARTZ
and THOMAS D. THEISEN
_____________
Appeal No. 98-2031
Application 08/794,1541
______________
ON BRIEF
_______________
Before FRANKFORT, STAAB and NASE, Administrative Patent Judges.
FRANKFORT, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final rejection of claims 1, 2, 37, 38, 40, 41,
50 and 58 through 65, which are all of the claims remaining in this application. Claims 3 through 36, 39,
1Application for patent filed February 3, 1997. According to appellants, this Application is a
continuation of Application 08/377,257, filed January 23, 1995.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007