Ex parte DOMBKOWSKI - Page 2




          Appeal No. 1998-2037                                                        
          Application No. 08/642,850                                                  


          application, as amended subsequent to the final rejection.2                 
               We REVERSE.                                                            
               The appellant's invention relates to rotary cutting die                
          plates and their associated rules or cutting blades used in a               
          rotary cutting machine and, more particularly, to rule guards               
          for insuring the alignment of adjacent confronting cutting                  
          dies when mounted on a cutting machine cylinder.  A more                    
          complete understanding of the invention can be derived from a               
          reading of exemplary claim 3, which appears as an attachment                
          to the amended brief filed on October 15, 1997 (Paper No. 10).              
               The prior art reference of record relied upon by the                   
          examiner in rejecting the appealed claims is:                               
               de Lanauze          4,012,978           Mar. 22, 1977                  
               The following rejection is before us for review:3                      
               claims 3 and 4 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) as              
          being anticipated by de Lanauze.                                            
               Rather than reiterate the conflicting viewpoints advanced              

               While the examiner has approved entry of the amendment filed September2                                                                     
          15, 1997, to claims 3 and 4, we note that this amendment has not been       
          clerically entered.  We also note that the amendment was given the same paper
          number (Paper No. 8) as the brief filed September 15, 1997.                 
               3The rejection of claims 3 and 4 under 35 U.S.C. § 112, second         
          paragraph, made in the final rejection has been withdrawn (answer, page 3). 
                                          2                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007