Appeal No. 98-2097 Application NO. 08/670,320 rejection itself, a rejection of appellants’ claims under3 35 U.S.C. § 103 is unsound. The decision of the examiner is reversed. REVERSED ) IRWIN CHARLES COHEN ) Administrative Patent Judge ) ) ) ) BOARD OF PATENT JEFFREY V. NASE ) Administrative Patent Judge ) APPEALS AND ) ) INTERFERENCES ) MURRIEL E. CRAWFORD ) Administrative Patent Judge ) ICC/sld 3In the answer (page 7), the examiner refers to so-called "well known" teachings which were never set forth in the statement of the rejection. Prior art evidence that is relied upon must be positively set forth in the statement of a rejection. See In re Hoch, 428 F.2d 1341, 1342, 166 USPQ 406, 497 (CCPA 1970). 7Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007