Appeal No. 98-2118 Application No. 08/459,986 the vane height and is configured with an approximately constant ratio of chord to pitch from half the vane height to the inner radius. The vane profile remains sub-stantially unaltered over the height of the vane. [Column 3, lines 10-17; emphasis added.] However, as is apparent from the above quotation, Elvekjaer also teaches that the vane guides are tapered inwardly in a radial direction. Additionally, as illustrated in Fig. 2, the pitch T of Elvekjaer is constant (or at least "generally" constant) and in line 51 of column 2 of the specification3 Elvekjaer simply refers to the "pitch T" (i.e., a single pitch as distinguished from a varying pitch) and makes no mention whatsoever of this pitch being variable. Since in Elvekjaer (1) the pitch is constant (or at least "generally" constant), (2) the ratio of chord to pitch increases from the outer radius to approximately half the vane height and (3) the ratio 3While of course drawings are not drawn to scale, they may nevertheless be used to establish relationships or proportions between the various components which are clearly depicted therein. See, e.g., In re Schreiber, 128 at 1478-79, 44 USPQ2d at 1431-32, Vas-Cath Inc. v. Mahurkar, 935 F.2d 1555, 1565, 19 USPQ2d 1111, 1118 (Fed. Cir. 1991), In re Mraz, 455 F.2d 1069, 1072, 173 USPQ 25, 27 (CCPA 1972) and In re Heinle, 342 F.2d 1001, 1007, 145 USPQ 131, 136 (CCPA 1965). 7Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007