Ex parte LEJAMBRE et al. - Page 7




                 Appeal No. 98-2118                                                                                                                     
                 Application No. 08/459,986                                                                                                             


                          the vane height and is configured with an                                                                                     
                          approximately constant ratio of chord to pitch from                                                                           
                          half the vane height to the inner radius.  The vane                                                                           
                          profile remains sub-stantially unaltered over the                                                                             
                          height of the vane.  [Column 3, lines 10-17;                                                                                  
                          emphasis added.]                                                                                                              
                 However, as is apparent from the above quotation, Elvekjaer                                                                            
                 also teaches that the vane guides are tapered inwardly in a                                                                            
                 radial direction.  Additionally, as illustrated in Fig. 2, the                                                                         
                 pitch T of Elvekjaer is constant (or at least "generally"                                                                              
                 constant)  and in line 51 of column 2 of the specification3                                                                                                                      
                 Elvekjaer simply refers to the "pitch T" (i.e., a single pitch                                                                         
                 as distinguished from a varying pitch) and makes no mention                                                                            
                 whatsoever of this pitch being variable.  Since in Elvekjaer                                                                           
                 (1) the pitch is constant (or at least "generally" constant),                                                                          
                 (2) the ratio of chord to pitch increases from the outer                                                                               
                 radius to approximately half the vane height and (3) the ratio                                                                         



                          3While of course drawings are not drawn to scale,                                                                             
                 they may nevertheless be used to establish relationships or                                                                            
                 proportions between the various components which are clearly                                                                           
                 depicted therein.  See, e.g., In re Schreiber, 128 at 1478-79,                                                                         
                 44 USPQ2d at 1431-32, Vas-Cath Inc. v. Mahurkar, 935 F.2d                                                                              
                 1555, 1565, 19 USPQ2d 1111, 1118 (Fed. Cir. 1991), In re Mraz,                                                                         
                 455                                                                                                                                    
                 F.2d 1069, 1072, 173 USPQ 25, 27 (CCPA 1972) and In re Heinle,                                                                         
                 342 F.2d 1001, 1007, 145 USPQ 131, 136 (CCPA 1965).                                                                                    
                                                                           7                                                                            





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007