Appeal No. 98-2158 Page 7
Application No. 08/610,279
re Warner, 379 F.2d 1011, 1017, 154 USPQ 173, 178 (CCPA 1967),
cert. denied, 389 U.S. 1057 (1968)).
With respect to claims 21-23, 30 and 31 there is nothing
in Scholler which would overcome the basic deficiencies of
Anderson that we have noted above in the § 102 rejection.
With respect to claims 24-27 there is nothing in the
combined teachings of Anderson and Scholler which would fairly
suggest a body having first and second sections wherein (1)
each section has an inside wall surrounding a chamber and a
first end wall closing one end of the chamber and a second
transverse end wall open to the chamber and (2) the abrasive
member having opposite ends adjacent the end walls of the first
and second sections as expressly required by independent claim
24.
For the reasons stated above, we will not sustain the
rejection of claims 1-16, 21-27, 30 and 31 under 35 U.S.C.
§ 103(a) based on the combined teachings of Anderson and
Scholler.
Under the provisions of 37 C.F.R. § 1.196(b) we make the
following new rejection:
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007