THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was
not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding
precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 18
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte EDGAR HUBER
____________
Appeal No. 98-2164
Application No. 08/587,9311
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before MEISTER, STAAB, and CRAWFORD, Administrative Patent
Judges.
MEISTER, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
Edgar Huber (the appellant) appeals from the final
rejection of claims 11 and 13-15. Claims 16 and 17, the only2
1Application for patent filed January 17, 1996.
2Independent claim 11 has been amended subsequent to
final rejection.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007