Ex parte GEORGE - Page 2




             Appeal No. 98-2352                                                                                 
             Application 08/245,870                                                                             


             Appellants’ invention relates to an exercise machine that is specially designed for                
             exercising the lower back muscles of a user. As noted on page 2 of the specification,              
             it is appellants’ intention to provide an exercise machine that properly isolates the              
             lower back so as to primarily exercise the spinae erector muscle group of the lower                
             back in an isotonic manner.                                                                        


             Claims 1, 10 and 18 are representative of the subject matter on appeal and a                       
             copy of those claims, as reproduced from Appendix A of appellants’ brief, is attached              
             to this decision.                                                                                  


             The prior art references of record relied upon by the examiner in rejecting the                    
             appealed claims are:                                                                               
             Smidt et al. (Smidt)                        4,462,252      Jul.    31, 1984                        
             Rockwell                                        4,623,144  Nov.  18, 1986                          
             Sammaratano                                4,753,126       Jun.   28, 1988                         
             Marras et al. (Marras)                    5,094,249        Mar.  10, 1992                          
             Boren                                             5,269,738Dec.  14, 1993                          

             Claims 1 through 8, 10 through 16, 18 and 20 through 24 stand rejected under 35                    
             U.S.C. §102(b) as anticipated by, or in the alternative under 35 U.S.C. §103 as                    
             obvious over, Rockwell.                                                                            


                                                       2                                                        




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007