Appeal No. 98-2417 Application 08/570,894 forms the top of the container. As is apparent from Rudick, the container therein includes opening means (19) that utilizes a pull tab pivotably secured to the planar flange of the second compartment that forms the top of the container. The pivoting movement of the pull tab in Rudick is that expected of a conventional pull tab, wherein one end of the tab may be lifted upwardly and pivoted away from the top of the container, while the other end is pressed downwardly to force open the breakable seal that defines the openable liquid dispensing opening. Thus, we will sustain the examiner’s rejection of claim 10 under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) as being anticipated by Rudick. We will not sustain the examiner’s rejection of claim 11 under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) as being anticipated by Rudick. Claim 11 addresses the capability of the pull tab to pivot between the position seen in Figure 3 of the drawings and the position seen in Figure 4 of the drawings. When positioned as in Figure 3, the pull tab closes or "at least partially obstructs" the opening to the second enclosure, while after being pivoted upwardly as in Figure 3 of the drawings, the 9Page: Previous 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007