THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered
today (1) was not written for publication in a law
journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 16
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
________________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
________________
Ex parte THOMAS E. POULSEN
________________
Appeal No. 98-2456
Application No. 08/748,1581
________________
ON BRIEF
________________
Before CALVERT, MEISTER and FRANKFORT, Administrative Patent
Judges.
FRANKFORT, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final
rejection of claims 10, 14, 18, 23, 24, 27 and 28. Claims 1
through 9, 11 through 13, 15 through 17, 19 through 22, 25 and
1Application for patent filed November 12, 1996.
According to appellant, this application is a continuation of
Application No. 08/483,281, filed June 7, 1995, now abandoned.
-1-
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007