Appeal No. 98-2520
Application 08/613,792
Claim 25 stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as
being unpatentable over Roy in view of Billings, Kusumoto and
Akatsuka.
Claims 26 and 27 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. §
103 as being unpatentable over Roy in view of Billings,
Kusumoto and Akatsuka as applied above and further in view of
Nagamoto.
Claim 29 stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as
also being unpatentable over Roy in view of Billings, Kusumoto
and Akatsuka as applied above and further in view of Nagamoto.
Reference is made to the examiner’s answer (Paper
No. 15, mailed July 17, 1998) for the examiner's reasoning in
support of the above-noted rejections and to the appeal brief
(Paper No. 14, filed May 28, 1998) for appellant's arguments
thereagainst.
OPINION
4
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007