Appeal No. 98-2559
Application 08/633,101
Appellant’s invention pertains to a method for casting a
composite article. An understanding of the invention can be
derived from a reading of exemplary claim 10, as it appears in
the amendment filed May 6, 1997 (Paper No. 7). 2
As evidence of obviousness, the examiner has applied the
document specified below:
Kawai et al 63-242461 Oct. 7, 1988
Japan (Kawai)3
The following rejection is before us for review.
Claims 10 through 13 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. §
103(a) as being unpatentable over Kawai (Japan 63-242461).
2The copy of the claim in the APPENDIX to the main brief
was not an accurate copy of claim 10.
3Our understanding of this foreign language document is
derived from a reading of a translation thereof prepared in
the United States Patent and Trademark Office. A copy of the
translation is appended to this opinion.
2
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007