Appeal No. 98-2655
Application 08/698,743
Rather than reiterate the examiner's full statement of
the above-noted rejections and the conflicting viewpoints
advanced by the examiner and appellant regarding those
rejections, we make reference to the examiner's answer (Paper
No. 12, mailed
March 10, 1998) for the examiner's complete reasoning in
support of the rejections, and to appellant’s brief (Paper No.
11, filed February 5, 1998) and reply brief (Paper No. 13,
filed
April 13, 1998) for appellant’s arguments thereagainst.
OPINION
In reaching our decision in this appeal, we have given
careful consideration to appellant’s specification and claims,
to the applied prior art references, and to the respective
positions articulated by appellant and the examiner. As a
consequence of our review we have reached the determinations
which follow.
4
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007