Ex parte GARUGLIERI - Page 3




                 Appeal No. 1998-2700                                                                                                                   
                 Application No. 08/722,452                                                                                                             


                                                           DECISION ON APPEAL                                                                           
                                   This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's                                                                     
                 final rejection of claims 15, 16, 19, 21, 22, 24, 26 and 27,                                                                           
                 which are all of the claims remaining in the application.                                             2                                
                 Claims 1 through 14, 17, 18, 20, 23 and 25 have been canceled.                                                                         


                          Appellant’s invention relates to a combination chop and                                                                       
                 table saw, otherwise known as a flip-over saw.  More                                                                                   
                 particularly, the invention relates to such a saw which is                                                                             
                 capable of making bevel cuts in both its table saw mode and                                                                            
                 its miter saw mode, and to a pointer and gearing arrangement                                                                           
                 for accurately and easily identifying the angle which the saw                                                                          
                 blade makes to the vertical.  Claims 15 and 21 are                                                                                     
                 representative of the subject matter on appeal, and a copy of                                                                          
                 those independent claims may be found in the Appendix to                                                                               
                 appellant’s brief.                                                                                                                     



                          2Claim 24 was amended subsequent to the final rejection                                                                       
                 in a paper filed September 29, 1997 (Paper No. 17).  As noted                                                                          
                 in the advisory action mailed October 10, 1997 (Paper No. 18),                                                                         
                 the rejection of claim 24 under 35 U.S.C. § 112, second                                                                                
                 paragraph, made in the final rejection, was overcome by this                                                                           
                 amendment.                                                                                                                             
                                                                           3                                                                            





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007