Ex parte FISCHER - Page 2




                 Appeal No. 1998-2702                                                                                                                   
                 Application No. 08/466,507                                                                                                             

                          The appellant's invention is directed to a                                                                                    
                 superplastically formed part made from a blank.  The claims                                                                            
                 before us on appeal have been reproduced in an appendix to the                                                                         
                 Brief.                                                                                                                                 


                                                               THE REFERENCES                                                                           
                          The references relied upon by the examiner to support the                                                                     
                 final rejection are:                                                                                                                   
                 Bertolini et al. (Bertolini)                                            5,215,600                           Jun.                       
                 1, 1993                                                                                                                                
                 Japanese Patent (Nakamura)                     2               1-197020                            Nov. 8,                             
                 1989                                                                                                                                   


                                                               THE REJECTIONS                                                                           
                          Claims 4, 5 and 7 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 112,                                                                       
                 second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to                                                                                   
                 particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter                                                                         
                 which the appellant regards as the invention.                                                                                          
                          Claim 4 stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) as being                                                                     
                 anticipated by Nakamura.                                                                                                               

                          2A PTO translation is enclosed.                                                                                               
                                                                           2                                                                            





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007