Appeal No. 98-2769
Application 08/485,960
appeal, but not with regard to claims 1, 2, 5 through 8, 10 through 18 and 20; and 5) that the
examiner’s rejections of claims 3, 4, 9 and 19 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 have also not been sustained.
Since at least one rejection of each of the claims on appeal has been sustained, it follows that
the decision of the examiner rejecting claims 1 through 27 on appeal is affirmed.
No time period for taking any subsequent action in connection with this appeal may be
extended under 37 CFR § 1.136(a).
AFFIRMED
IAN A. CALVERT )
Administrative Patent Judge )
)
)
) BOARD OF PATENT
CHARLES E. FRANKFORT )
Administrative Patent Judge ) APPEALS AND
)
) INTERFERENCES
)
MURRIEL E. CRAWFORD )
Administrative Patent Judge )
14
Page: Previous 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007