THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for
publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 25
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
__________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
__________
Ex parte TESSEMA D. SHIFFERAW
__________
Appeal No. 98-2771
Application 08/428,8631
___________
ON BRIEF
___________
Before FRANKFORT, STAAB and NASE, Administrative Patent
Judges.
FRANKFORT, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final
rejection of claims 1 through 20, all the claims pending in
the application. In the examiner’s answer, page 14, it is
1Application for patent filed April 25, 1995. According to appellant, the
application is a continuation-in-part of Application 08/088,191, filed
July 6, 1993, now abandoned, which is a continuation-in-part of Application 07/912,552,
filed July 13, 1992, now U.S. Patent No. 5,277,675, issued
January 11, 1994.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007