Appeal No. 98-2792 Application 08/516,257 monitored remotely by detection means (44) which measures, for example, the level of fluorescence of the freed analog-analyte molecules and converts the measured level of light emerging from the sensor (4) into the desired concentration information for the analyte of interest. One example of a use for the system disclosed by appellant (Example 1, page 22) is for determining the concentration of glucose in blood, e.g., in a patient with diabetes mellitus. A copy of representative claims 1 and 15 is attached to this decision. The prior art references relied upon by the examiner in rejecting the appealed claims are: Schultz 4,344,438 Aug. 17, 1982 Komives et al. (Komives) 5,143,066 Sept. 1, 1992 Claims 15 and 16 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) as being anticipated by Schultz. 5Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007