Ex parte SCHULTZ - Page 5




          Appeal No. 98-2792                                                          
          Application 08/516,257                                                      



          monitored remotely by detection means (44) which measures, for              
          example, the level of fluorescence of the freed analog-analyte              
          molecules and converts the measured level of light emerging                 
          from the sensor (4) into  the desired concentration                         
          information for the analyte of interest.  One example of a use              
          for the system disclosed by appellant (Example 1, page 22) is               
          for determining the concentration of glucose in blood, e.g.,                
          in a patient with diabetes mellitus.                                        


                    A copy of representative claims 1 and 15 is attached              
          to this decision.                                                           


                    The prior art references relied upon by the examiner              
          in rejecting the appealed claims are:                                       


          Schultz                        4,344,438       Aug.  17, 1982               
          Komives et al. (Komives)       5,143,066       Sept.  1, 1992               


                    Claims 15 and 16 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C.                   
          § 102(b) as being anticipated by Schultz.                                   


                                          5                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007