THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for publication in a law
journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 27
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_____________
Ex parte PHILLIP E. KECK, DAVID J. ARTEMAN
DAVID A. FELL, JERRY A. JOHNSTON
and LYNN K. WEMAHIEU
_____________
Appeal No. 98-2812
Application 08/473,0541
______________
ON BRIEF
_______________
Before COHEN, FRANKFORT and PATE, Administrative Patent Judges.
FRANKFORT, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final rejection of claims 1, 2, 4 and 6 through
19, which are all of the claims remaining in the application. Claims 3, 5 and 20 through 32 have been
1Application for patent filed June 7, 1995.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007