Appeal No. 98-2837
Application 08/471,458
of the report), to be unwarranted. Nor do we find any comment in the record from the examiner
regarding the evidence presented by appellant in the form of the eight items mentioned at the top of
page 6 of appellant’s brief.
In light of the foregoing, we will not sustain the examiner’s rejection of claims 1, 3, 4, 6 through
13, 16, 19, 20, 24 and 26 through 29 under 35 U.S.C. § 101.
The decision of the examiner in this case is, accordingly, reversed.
REVERSED
NEAL E. ABRAMS )
Administrative Patent Judge )
)
) BOARD OF PATENT
) APPEALS AND
CHARLES E. FRANKFORT ) INTERFERENCES
Administrative Patent Judge )
)
5
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007