Appeal No. 1998-2854 Page 2 Application No. 08/500,278 We REVERSE and enter a new rejection pursuant to 37 CFR § 1.196(b). BACKGROUND The appellants' invention relates to a system for enhancing blood flow to and from the heart during cardiopulmonary resuscitation of a patient. An understanding of the invention can be derived from a reading of exemplary claim 1, which appears in the appendix to the appellants' brief. The prior art references of record relied upon by the examiner (i.e., the applied prior art) in rejecting the appealed claims are: 2(...continued) (Paper No. 5, mailed November 26, 1996) states that claims 1-9 are rejected, the detailed action (pp. 2-4) thereof only sets forth rejections of claims 1 -7. 3While the examiner has approved entry of the amendment after final rejection (Paper No. 6, filed March 3, 1997), we note that this amendment has not been clerically entered.Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007