Appeal No. 98-2888
Application No. 29/044,927
configuration, which is not even shown in the DuBe design,
since DuBe has no comparable component. Finally, we do not
agree with the examiner that the square aperture with central
slit provided on the distal end of the disk holder is a de
minimis difference which does not affect the overall
appearance of the design (see Figure 2).
The rejection is not sustained.
6
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007