Appeal No. 98-2889 Application 29/022,106 Appellant maintains, however, that the declarations of Mr. Michael J. Giamati, the sole inventor, and Mr. Gary G. Garcia, manager of product support and customer service for the assignee of the present invention, establish “that the claimed article was designed for sale and display, and that the appearance of the article had a substantial influence on the design and ornamentality of the article [such that] . . . an adequate showing of ornamentality has been provided” (brief, page 2). The examiner contends, however, that appellant has not shown that the appearance of the article was a matter of concern at some point in the life of the article. In his declaration, inventor Michael J. Giamati declares that he “designed the brush assembly housing claimed in the captioned application to have a ‘heavy duty’ look and feel.” For his part, assignee’s manager Gary G. Garcia declares, on information and belief, that (1) “at least some customers have a perception that a brush assembly having a housing with a ‘heavy duty’ appearance, will perform better,” (2) “this perception is at least partly based on the appearance of the brush assembly housing,” and (3) “the ‘heavy duty’ appearance -3-Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007