Appeal No. 1998-2914 Application 08/510,971 appeal from the final rejection of claims 1-10, the only claims present in the application. We REVERSE. The appellants' invention pertains to a device for obtaining register deviations in a multi-color rotary printing machine. Independent claims 1 and 3 are further illustrative of the appealed subject matter and a copy thereof may be found in the appendix to the brief. The answer states that the following rejections are applicable to the claims on appeal:2 Claims 1-10 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 112, first paragraph, as being based upon a nonenabling disclosure. Claims 1-10 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 112, second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the appellants regard as the invention. The rejections are explained on pages 5-17 of the answer and the arguments of the appellants may be found on pages 19- 38 of the brief. 2On page 4 of the answer the examiner expressly withdrew the final rejection of the appealed claims under 35 U.S.C. §§ 101 and 103. 2Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007