THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper No. 13 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ____________ Ex parte PAUL E. MOODY ____________ Appeal No. 1998-2945 Application No. 08/624,7341 ____________ ON BRIEF ____________ Before CALVERT, FRANKFORT, and NASE, Administrative Patent Judges. NASE, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final rejection of claims 1, 4 through 7 and 12 through 15. Claims 2 and 3 are allowed. Claims 8 through 11 have been objected to as depending from a non-allowed claim. 1Application for patent filed March 26, 1996.Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007