Ex parte GEMRA et al. - Page 9




          Appeal No. 98-3288                                                          
          Application 08/630,304                                                      


          rejection of claims 1 and 11 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being                 
          unpatentable over Salmon in view of Nilsson.  Additionally, we              
          have introduced a new ground of rejection for claim 1 and                   
          REMANDED the application to the examiner for the reason                     
          indicated above.                                                            
               This decision contains a new ground of rejection pursuant              
          to 37 CFR § 1.196(b)(amended effective Dec. 1, 1997, by final               
          rule notice, 62 Fed. Reg. 53,131, 53,197 (Oct. 10, 1997), 1203              
          Off. Gaz. Pat. & Trademark Office 63, 122 (Oct. 21, 1997)).                 
          37 CFR                                                                      
          § 1.196(b) provides that, “A new ground of rejection shall not              
          be considered final for purposes of judicial review.”                       
               37 CFR § 1.196(b) also provides that the appellant,                    
          WITHIN TWO MONTHS FROM THE DATE OF THE DECISION, must exercise              
          one of the following two options with respect to the new                    
          ground of rejection to avoid termination of proceedings                     
          (§ 1.197(c)) as to the rejected claims:                                     
                    (1) Submit an appropriate amendment of the                        
               claims so rejected or a showing of facts relating to                   
               the claims so rejected, or both, and have the matter                   
               reconsidered by the examiner, in which event the                       
               application will be remanded to the examiner. . . .                    
                    (2) Request that the application be reheard                       
                                          9                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007