THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered
today (1) was not written for publication in a law
journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 29
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
________________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
________________
Ex parte JOHN E. MALONEY, CHARLES J. HINKLE, JR.
and JAMES O. STEVENSON
________________
Appeal No. 98-3299
Application 08/335,3311
________________
HEARD: MAY 7, 1999
________________
Before HAIRSTON, BARRETT and LALL, Administrative Patent
Judges.
LALL, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal from the final rejection of claims 1
through 4 and 6 through 93. Claim 5 has been canceled.
The disclosed invention concerns the apparatus and the
1Application for patent filed November 3, 1994.
-1-
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007