THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper No. 17 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ____________ Ex parte CAMILLO MORO ____________ Appeal No. 1998-3305 Application No. 08/381,8861 ____________ ON BRIEF ____________ Before COHEN, ABRAMS, and NASE, Administrative Patent Judges. NASE, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final rejection of claims 8 through 13, which are all of the claims pending in this application.2 1Application for patent filed February 22, 1995. 2Claims 8, 10, 11 and 13 were amended subsequent to the final rejection. In view of these amendments, the examiner withdrew the rejection of claims 8 through 13 under 35 U.S.C. § 112, second paragraph (see Paper No. 12, mailed August 19, (continued...)Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007